This looks like a challenge that Den may like: what would be the simplest workflow that could consistently process images in this fashion?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/28653536@N ... /lightbox/
p.s. Would it be a good idea to start a depository of PWP workflows, where members could share their designs (upload/download .wfl files and a short description how and why it works + pointers on best settings and what can go wrong).
Cheers.
Translating GIMP script to PWP workflow
Moderator: jsachs
-
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: April 25th, 2009, 12:56 am
- What is the make/model of your primary camera?: Fuji X-E2
- Contact:
Translating GIMP script to PWP workflow
Maciej Tomczak
Phototramp.com
Phototramp.com
Re: Translating GIMP script to PWP workflow
A workflow depository is a great idea. We would be glad to start a section of contributed workflows on the dl-c website.
If anyone has a workflow they would like to submit, please send it to info@dl-c.com. In addition to the .wfl workflow file, please also include
a short description of the workflow, any assumptions the workflow makes, and hints on how to customize the workflow, as appropriate.
Thanks,
Kiril
If anyone has a workflow they would like to submit, please send it to info@dl-c.com. In addition to the .wfl workflow file, please also include
a short description of the workflow, any assumptions the workflow makes, and hints on how to customize the workflow, as appropriate.
Thanks,
Kiril
Kiril Sinkel
Digital Light & Color
Digital Light & Color
-
- Posts: 243
- Joined: April 25th, 2009, 4:36 pm
- What is the make/model of your primary camera?: Panasonic G1
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Translating GIMP script to PWP workflow
Kiril,
Will PWP 5 wfl files be compatible with PWP 6 and vice-versa?
Mike.
Will PWP 5 wfl files be compatible with PWP 6 and vice-versa?
Mike.
Re: Translating GIMP script to PWP workflow
Good question. PWP 6 reads PWP 5 files but not the other way around. (PWP 5 recognizes PWP6 wfls and issues a clear message.)
A more robust wfl structure was necessary to create a single format that would work with both 32 and 64 bit versions interchangeably. The new format should not be a problem for users since once a user adopts PWP6, as there will be no reason to also use PWP5. In terms of the wfl exchange, we might want to make PWP 5 versions available, at least for a while.
Kiril
A more robust wfl structure was necessary to create a single format that would work with both 32 and 64 bit versions interchangeably. The new format should not be a problem for users since once a user adopts PWP6, as there will be no reason to also use PWP5. In terms of the wfl exchange, we might want to make PWP 5 versions available, at least for a while.
Kiril
Kiril Sinkel
Digital Light & Color
Digital Light & Color