Hello,
I know it is preferable to edit .tiff formatted image files; however, sometimes it becomes necessary to work with already compressed images. In the PWP universe, is there any advantage of one compressed format over another, e.g., .jpg vs .png? I tried to search on this set of terms, but the search algorithm says vs is too short and .jpg is too common, as is .jpeg. Is there any way to force a search of a particular term, say within a smaller set found in an initial search?
jpg vs png
Moderator: jsachs
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: January 18th, 2010, 1:56 pm
- What is the make/model of your primary camera?: Canon 70D
- Location: Eugene, OR USA
jpg vs png
Don Hirst
Canon 70D, 17-40L, 24-105L, 100-400L
Canon G10, G7x
Canon 70D, 17-40L, 24-105L, 100-400L
Canon G10, G7x
Re: jpg vs png
JPEG has the advantage that is retains most or all of the image metadata while PNG saves only limited metadata. JPEG only supports 8-bit black and white and 24-bit color and its compression is not lossless while PNG can save 16-bit black and white and 48-bit color images and also supports an optional alpha (mask) layer. PNG compression is lossless.
Jonathan Sachs
Digital Light & Color
Digital Light & Color