Vibrance vs. Saturation and PWP's Remap transform

Moderator: jsachs

Post Reply
den
Posts: 861
Joined: April 25th, 2009, 6:33 pm
What is the make/model of your primary camera?: Canon EOS-350D/Fuji X100T
Location: Birch Bay near Blaine, WA USA

Vibrance vs. Saturation and PWP's Remap transform

Post by den »

Ref 1: http://www.thelightsright.com/VibranceVersusSaturation
Vibrance increases the saturation for an image, but unlike the Saturation command, it includes two important protections:
•Skin tones are protected. This prevents skin tones from taking on a red or yellow cast.
•Highly saturated colors are protected against clipping. This avoids unwanted color shifts and loss of important detail.
Ref 2: Remap transform discussion during PWP5 Beta testing: http://dl-c.com/forum/comments.php?Disc ... e=1#Item_0

Introduction: Something to realize here is the difference between making saturation changes in the RGB color space and HSV color space.

In the RGB color space, saturation is NOT independent of Luminance [gray tone] and when making changes with a RGB Brightness curve, saturations will generally decrease with an increase in Luminance and increase with a decrease in Luminance... ...for the most part, these changes to saturation/Luminance are not objectionable and there is little shift in hues.

But for the HSV color space where Saturation is independent of both Hue and Value [gray tone], it is possible to increase the SkinColor hues/saturations greater than preference when attempting to achieve Mid/High saturation preferences resulting in a strong 'burnt red-orange' appearance to Low/Mid saturations... ...hence the possible need for SkinColor protection for both people and non-people image scenes.

The key to understanding the Remap transform is that it is essentially the ColorCorrect transform with a different User Interface and improved gradient [feathering] controls for preference color/tone changes:
...(a) both function in the HSV color space model.
...(b) Remap uses ColorPairs instead of ControlPoints with arrows.
...(c) Remap has a Chroma radius control for each individual ColorPair whereas ColorCorrect has a universal 0->1.0 radius slider for all ControlPoints.
...(d) Remap has a readily available Brightness (HSV-V) control for each individual ColorPair whereas ColorCorrect's ControlPoint brightness [HSV-V] requires a specific control point to be 'active'.
...(e) Remap's Tightness is essentially the same as the ColorCorrect 0->1.0 radius slider providing global application of the individual ColorPair Chroma/Brightness settings. Note: Tightness is maximum at a value of 1.00 and minium at 0.00... ...an opposite effect to the ColorCorrect Radius setting.
...(f) Remap [PWP6 v6.0.9] is currently limited to eight ColorPairs whereas ColorCorrect essentially has no such limitation.

Because of improved ColorPair gradient controls that Remap offers, concerns that saturation changes are not uniform while still true should not be as great as with the ColorCorrect transform.

The following reference image is available for you to download and use to set RGBCMY ColorPairs for general High Impact saturation image changes... the pairs change HSV-V from 50 to 60%; HSV-S from 33 to 90% with no change in HSV-H. The 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% gray tone [HSV-V] pairs can be used when neutralizing an image's color casts or blocking Brightness [HSV-V] changes. The SkinColor pairs can be used when saturation changes are to include Vibrance...
Hi-Impact-RemapPairs_33-90sat_60tone.jpg
Hi-Impact-RemapPairs_33-90sat_60tone.jpg (22.38 KiB) Viewed 2786 times
Example: Original image...
IMG_8223_original_400px.jpg
IMG_8223_original_400px.jpg (47.08 KiB) Viewed 2810 times
...End Post 1 of 2...
Last edited by den on March 7th, 2012, 3:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
den
Posts: 861
Joined: April 25th, 2009, 6:33 pm
What is the make/model of your primary camera?: Canon EOS-350D/Fuji X100T
Location: Birch Bay near Blaine, WA USA

Re: Vibrance vs. Saturation and PWP's Remap transform

Post by den »

...continuation...

Original image saturation Remap-ped with no vibrance...
IMG_8223_no-protection_400px.jpg
IMG_8223_no-protection_400px.jpg (47.64 KiB) Viewed 2799 times
Original image saturation Remap-ped with vibrance...
IMG_8223_protectedSkinColors_400px.jpg
IMG_8223_protectedSkinColors_400px.jpg (47.45 KiB) Viewed 2792 times
IMG_8223 Remap-ped applied saturation-vibrance transform settings...
Remap_Settings_protectedSkinColors.jpg
Remap_Settings_protectedSkinColors.jpg (47.12 KiB) Viewed 2794 times
Ask if there are questions... ...consider understanding the question to better understand the answer... ;-)

...End Post 2 of 2...
den
Posts: 861
Joined: April 25th, 2009, 6:33 pm
What is the make/model of your primary camera?: Canon EOS-350D/Fuji X100T
Location: Birch Bay near Blaine, WA USA

Re: Vibrance vs. Saturation and PWP's Remap transform

Post by den »

A higher resolution example with mouse on/off comparisons of a non-people scene where SkinColors [vibrance] can play a role when making RGBCMY hue/saturation/value (tone) changes: http://www.ncplus.net/~birchbay/misc/Vi ... /index.htm
Post Reply