An update is available to Version 8.0.165 (11-Oct-2020)
The changes (taken from the update log) are:
Mask Paint Tool: fixed problem causing initial shift-click on input image to not paint.
File Open: fixed problem causing PWP to ask on profile mismatch even if set to convert without asking.
Levels and Color transformation: added items to Settings menu to let you adjust the dynamic range and auto white balance thresholds.
Readout tool: added red, green and blue highlight/shadow warning indicators.
Update Available - Version 8.0.165
Moderator: jsachs
Update Available - Version 8.0.165
Jonathan Sachs
Digital Light & Color
Digital Light & Color
Re: Update Available - Version 8.0.165
Re: Levels and Color transformation changes... Cool! A discreet and flexible solution.
-
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: April 25th, 2009, 12:56 am
- What is the make/model of your primary camera?: Fuji X-E2
- Contact:
Re: Update Available - Version 8.0.165
Would the Low Dynamic Range correspond to the previous 0.01% of the brightest pixels in L&C and the Medium and High increase from that?
Maciej Tomczak
Phototramp.com
Phototramp.com
Re: Update Available - Version 8.0.165
The thresholds for DR are low = 0.0001, medium = 0.00005, high = 0.00001
The thresholds for AWB are low = 0.0005, medium = 0.05, high = 0.01
The thresholds for AWB are low = 0.0005, medium = 0.05, high = 0.01
Jonathan Sachs
Digital Light & Color
Digital Light & Color
-
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: April 25th, 2009, 12:56 am
- What is the make/model of your primary camera?: Fuji X-E2
- Contact:
Re: Update Available - Version 8.0.165
Just want to make sure that I get it right:
For DR the low --> medium --> high threshold progression includes an increasingly lower fraction of the brightest pixels (0.01% --> 0.005% --> 0.001%) in the average to guess the white point.
I'm not sure if I understand the values for the AWB - is the Low one expressed as a fraction and the other two as percentages, but then the medium would be the same as low...
For DR the low --> medium --> high threshold progression includes an increasingly lower fraction of the brightest pixels (0.01% --> 0.005% --> 0.001%) in the average to guess the white point.
I'm not sure if I understand the values for the AWB - is the Low one expressed as a fraction and the other two as percentages, but then the medium would be the same as low...
Maciej Tomczak
Phototramp.com
Phototramp.com
Re: Update Available - Version 8.0.165
The AWB threshold determines what fraction of the brightest pixels in the image are averaged to determine the white point. Higher threshold averages more pixels by including some that are not as bright.
Jonathan Sachs
Digital Light & Color
Digital Light & Color
-
- Posts: 1372
- Joined: April 25th, 2009, 12:56 am
- What is the make/model of your primary camera?: Fuji X-E2
- Contact:
Re: Update Available - Version 8.0.165
So for DR higher thresholds include fewer pixels and for AWB higher thresholds include more pixels? I was looking at the values above, but I wasn't sure...
Maciej Tomczak
Phototramp.com
Phototramp.com